Polynesia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: 15.1.1 Forest area as a proportion of total land area — Value
15.1.1 Forest area as a proportion of total land area — Value over time
- Polynesia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 73.23 % against 48.58 % in Polynesia, a difference of 24.65 %.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.5 times Polynesia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 14th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 15th of 21 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.67 % | 73.13 % | 24.46 % | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2000s | 49.7 % | 73.18 % | 23.48 % | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 48.92 % | 73.21 % | 24.29 % | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 48.71 % | 73.23 % | 24.52 % | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.1.1 forest area as a proportion of total land area — value, Polynesia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 73.23 % against 48.58 % in Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 15.1.1 forest area as a proportion of total land area — value between Polynesia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 24.65 %, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Polynesia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for 15.1.1 forest area as a proportion of total land area — value?
- Polynesia ranks 14th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 15th of 21 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.1.1 Forest area as a proportion of total land area — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.