Belize vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management
15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management over time
- Belize
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 165.88 1000 ha against 102.79 1000 ha in Belize, a difference of 63.09 1000 ha.
That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.6 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Belize ranks 58th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 55th of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 104.89 1000 ha | 76.05 1000 ha | 28.84 1000 ha | Belize |
| 2010s | 174.03 1000 ha | 161.28 1000 ha | 12.76 1000 ha | Belize |
| 2020s | 121.07 1000 ha | 165.88 1000 ha | 44.81 1000 ha | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management, Belize or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 165.88 1000 ha against 102.79 1000 ha in Belize as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management between Belize and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 63.09 1000 ha, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management?
- Belize ranks 58th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 55th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management certification scheme — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.