Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1,233 1000 ha
in 2024
Latvia
1,779 1000 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
Latvia rank
27th

15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Latvia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020072024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1,779 1000 ha against 1,233 1000 ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 546 1000 ha.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Latvia ranks 27th of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2000s 1,043 1000 ha 843.53 1000 ha 199.43 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1,261 1000 ha 1,950 1000 ha 689.69 1000 ha Latvia
2020s 1,303 1000 ha 1,895 1000 ha 592.69 1000 ha Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 1,779 1000 ha against 1,233 1000 ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
546 1000 ha, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Latvia rank globally for 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Latvia ranks 27th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management certification scheme — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-2-1-forest-area-under-an-independently-verified-forest-management-certification-scheme/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-2-1-forest-area-under-an-independently-verified-forest-management-certification-scheme/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management certification scheme — Value
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
287 places, 4,018 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.