Malaysia vs Norway: 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management
15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management over time
- Malaysia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 7,256 1000 ha against 6,798 1000 ha in Malaysia, a difference of 458 1000 ha.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 11th and Norway ranks 10th of 232 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 64.22 1000 ha | 7,418 1000 ha | 7,354 1000 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 4,659 1000 ha | 8,016 1000 ha | 3,357 1000 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 5,849 1000 ha | 7,352 1000 ha | 1,503 1000 ha | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management, Malaysia or Norway?
- Norway, at 7,256 1000 ha against 6,798 1000 ha in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management between Malaysia and Norway?
- 458 1000 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management?
- Malaysia ranks 11th and Norway ranks 10th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management certification scheme — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.