Northern America and Europe vs Sweden: 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management
15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management over time
- Northern America and Europe
- Sweden
How they compare
Northern America and Europe currently reports 310,998 1000 ha against 22,469 1000 ha in Sweden, a difference of 288,529 1000 ha.
That makes Northern America and Europe's figure about 13.8 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Northern America and Europe ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 2nd of 33 groups.
Northern America and Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America and Europe | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 134,680 1000 ha | 12,254 1000 ha | 122,426 1000 ha | Northern America and Europe |
| 2010s | 348,163 1000 ha | 16,085 1000 ha | 332,078 1000 ha | Northern America and Europe |
| 2020s | 348,420 1000 ha | 21,636 1000 ha | 326,784 1000 ha | Northern America and Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management, Northern America and Europe or Sweden?
- Northern America and Europe, at 310,998 1000 ha against 22,469 1000 ha in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management between Northern America and Europe and Sweden?
- 288,529 1000 ha, with Northern America and Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Europe and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Northern America and Europe and Sweden rank globally for 15.2.1 forest area under an independently verified forest management?
- Northern America and Europe ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 2nd of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.2.1 Forest area under an independently verified forest management certification scheme — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.