Malaysia vs Rwanda: 15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered

Malaysia
615.4 km2
in 2021
Rwanda
639.6 km2
in 2021
Malaysia rank
54th
Rwanda rank
52nd

15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered over time

  • Malaysia
  • Rwanda
0200400600800200020102021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 639.6 km2 against 615.4 km2 in Malaysia, a difference of 24.2 km2.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.

Malaysia ranks 54th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 170 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 460.6 km2 845.95 km2 385.35 km2 Rwanda
2010s 667.8 km2 733.23 km2 65.43 km2 Rwanda
2020s 615.4 km2 639.6 km2 24.2 km2 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.4.2a mountain green cover area: total; land cover: shrub-covered, Malaysia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 639.6 km2 against 615.4 km2 in Malaysia as of 2021.
What is the difference in 15.4.2a mountain green cover area: total; land cover: shrub-covered between Malaysia and Rwanda?
24.2 km2, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for 15.4.2a mountain green cover area: total; land cover: shrub-covered?
Malaysia ranks 54th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Rwanda: 15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-area-total-land-cover-shrub-covered-areas-value/malaysia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-area-total-land-cover-shrub-covered-areas-value/malaysia/rwanda/">Malaysia vs Rwanda: 15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2a Mountain green cover area: Total; Land Cover: Shrub-covered areas — Value
Unit
km2
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
206 places, 1,236 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.