Afghanistan vs Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely

Afghanistan
14.26 %
in 2021
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
45.6 %
in 2021
Afghanistan rank
3rd
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
1st

15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
1020304050200020102021

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 45.6 % against 14.26 % in Afghanistan, a difference of 31.34 %.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 3.2 times Afghanistan's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 1st of 169 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Difference Ahead
2000s 14.16 % 45.65 % 31.49 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 14.21 % 45.65 % 31.44 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 14.26 % 45.6 % 31.34 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: sparsely, Afghanistan or Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 45.6 % against 14.26 % in Afghanistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: sparsely between Afghanistan and Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha?
31.34 %, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Afghanistan and Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: sparsely?
Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 1st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-total-land-cover-sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-value/afghanistan/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-total-land-cover-sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-value/afghanistan/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/">Afghanistan vs Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
205 places, 1,230 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.