Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Chad: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
39.93 USD/m3
in 2023
Chad
39.54 USD/m3
in 2023
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
122nd
Chad rank
124th

6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Chad
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 39.93 USD/m3 against 39.54 USD/m3 in Chad, a difference of 0.39 USD/m3.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 122nd and Chad ranks 124th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Chad Difference Ahead
2000s 20.58 USD/m3 23.62 USD/m3 3.03 USD/m3 Chad
2010s 58 USD/m3 35.27 USD/m3 22.73 USD/m3 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2020s 44.15 USD/m3 42.76 USD/m3 1.39 USD/m3 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Chad?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 39.93 USD/m3 against 39.54 USD/m3 in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Chad?
0.39 USD/m3, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Chad?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Chad rank globally for 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 122nd and Chad ranks 124th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Chad: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-services-g-to-t-value/afghanistan/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-services-g-to-t-value/afghanistan/chad/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Chad: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value
Unit
USD/m3
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 4,968 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.