Costa Rica vs Eritrea: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value

Costa Rica
46.5 USD/m3
in 2023
Eritrea
43.15 USD/m3
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
115th
Eritrea rank
118th

6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Eritrea
050100150200200020112023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 46.5 USD/m3 against 43.15 USD/m3 in Eritrea, a difference of 3.35 USD/m3.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 115th and Eritrea ranks 118th of 170 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Eritrea Difference Ahead
2000s 34.3 USD/m3 25.37 USD/m3 8.93 USD/m3 Costa Rica
2010s 74.28 USD/m3 35.96 USD/m3 38.32 USD/m3 Costa Rica
2020s 46.28 USD/m3 41.45 USD/m3 4.84 USD/m3 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value, Costa Rica or Eritrea?
Costa Rica, at 46.5 USD/m3 against 43.15 USD/m3 in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value between Costa Rica and Eritrea?
3.35 USD/m3, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eritrea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Eritrea rank globally for 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value?
Costa Rica ranks 115th and Eritrea ranks 118th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Eritrea: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-services-g-to-t-value/costa-rica/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-services-g-to-t-value/costa-rica/eritrea/">Costa Rica vs Eritrea: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value
Unit
USD/m3
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 4,968 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.