Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value

Sao Tome and Principe
0.67 %
in 2023
Serbia
0.77 %
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
119th
Serbia rank
116th

6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Serbia
00.20.40.60.81200820152023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.77 % against 0.67 % in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1 %.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 119th and Serbia ranks 116th of 165 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.6733 % 0.7383 % 0.065 % Serbia
2020s 0.67 % 0.7725 % 0.1025 % Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 6.4.2 level of water stress (services (g to t)) — value, Sao Tome and Principe or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.77 % against 0.67 % in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in 6.4.2 level of water stress (services (g to t)) — value between Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
0.1 %, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia rank globally for 6.4.2 level of water stress (services (g to t)) — value?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 119th and Serbia ranks 116th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-2-level-of-water-stress-services-g-to-t-value/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/6-4-2-level-of-water-stress-services-g-to-t-value/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
208 places, 4,787 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.