Armenia vs Sri Lanka: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Armenia
80.72
in 2020
Sri Lanka
79.16
in 2020
Armenia rank
134th
Sri Lanka rank
136th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Armenia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 80.72 against 79.16 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.56.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 134th and Sri Lanka ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.38 | 79.23 | 2.15 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 80.61 | 79.19 | 1.42 | Armenia |
| 2020s | 80.72 | 79.16 | 1.56 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Armenia or Sri Lanka?
- Armenia, at 80.72 against 79.16 in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Armenia and Sri Lanka?
- 1.56, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Sri Lanka rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Armenia ranks 134th and Sri Lanka ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.