Botswana vs East Timor: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Botswana
155.25
in 2020
East Timor
150
in 2020
Botswana rank
62nd
East Timor rank
65th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Botswana
- East Timor
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 155.25 against 150 in East Timor, a difference of 5.25.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 62nd and East Timor ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 155.25 | 150 | 5.25 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 155.25 | 150 | 5.25 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 155.25 | 150 | 5.25 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Botswana or East Timor?
- Botswana, at 155.25 against 150 in East Timor as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Botswana and East Timor?
- 5.25, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Botswana ranks 62nd and East Timor ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.