Ecuador vs Nepal: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Ecuador
177.02
in 2020
Nepal
176.82
in 2020
Ecuador rank
45th
Nepal rank
46th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 177.02 against 176.82 in Nepal, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Nepal ranks 46th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 177.02 | 184.05 | 7.03 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 177.02 | 176.82 | 0.2 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 177.02 | 176.82 | 0.2 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Ecuador, at 177.02 against 176.82 in Nepal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 0.2, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Nepal ranks 46th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.