Eritrea vs United Arab Emirates: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Eritrea
72.52
in 2020
United Arab Emirates
74.43
in 2020
Eritrea rank
144th
United Arab Emirates rank
142nd
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Eritrea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 74.43 against 72.52 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.91.
Across all 8 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 144th and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.92 | 74.35 | 2.43 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 72.37 | 74.41 | 2.04 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 72.52 | 74.43 | 1.91 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Eritrea or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 74.43 against 72.52 in Eritrea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 1.91, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Eritrea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Eritrea ranks 144th and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.