What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between Eswatini and Uruguay?

2.29 tonnes per hectare, with Uruguay ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uruguay?

10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Uruguay: Above-ground forest biomass

Eswatini

82.57 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

Uruguay

84.86 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

Eswatini rank

141st

Uruguay rank

138th

Above-ground forest biomass over time

Eswatini
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 84.86 tonnes per hectare against 82.57 tonnes per hectare in Eswatini, a difference of 2.29 tonnes per hectare.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.

Eswatini ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 138th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1990s	83.55 tonnes per hectare	95.33 tonnes per hectare	11.78 tonnes per hectare	Uruguay
2000s	83.28 tonnes per hectare	78.01 tonnes per hectare	5.27 tonnes per hectare	Eswatini
2010s	78.46 tonnes per hectare	94.37 tonnes per hectare	15.91 tonnes per hectare	Uruguay
2020s	82.65 tonnes per hectare	84.24 tonnes per hectare	1.59 tonnes per hectare	Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground forest biomass, Eswatini or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 84.86 tonnes per hectare against 82.57 tonnes per hectare in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between Eswatini and Uruguay?: 2.29 tonnes per hectare, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uruguay?: 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Uruguay rank globally for above-ground forest biomass?: Eswatini ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 138th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Uruguay: Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/eswatini/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/eswatini/uruguay/">Eswatini vs Uruguay: Above-ground forest biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Above-ground forest biomass
Unit: tonnes per hectare
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 215 places, 1,311 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare).