Finland vs Tunisia: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Finland
59.77
in 2020
Tunisia
58.74
in 2020
Finland rank
158th
Tunisia rank
159th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Finland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 59.77 against 58.74 in Tunisia, a difference of 1.03.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Finland ranks 158th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.14 | 53.39 | 4.25 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 58.75 | 58.71 | 0.04 | Finland |
| 2020s | 59.77 | 58.74 | 1.03 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Finland or Tunisia?
- Finland, at 59.77 against 58.74 in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Finland and Tunisia?
- 1.03, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Finland ranks 158th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.