French Polynesia vs East Timor: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
French Polynesia
148.92
in 2020
East Timor
150
in 2020
French Polynesia rank
66th
East Timor rank
65th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- French Polynesia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 150 against 148.92 in French Polynesia, a difference of 1.08.
Across all 8 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 65th of 204 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 148.94 | 150 | 1.06 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 148.92 | 150 | 1.08 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 148.92 | 150 | 1.08 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, French Polynesia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 150 against 148.92 in French Polynesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between French Polynesia and East Timor?
- 1.08, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do French Polynesia and East Timor rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- French Polynesia ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.