What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between French Polynesia and Zimbabwe?

2.04 tonnes per hectare, with French Polynesia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Zimbabwe?

10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

French Polynesia vs Zimbabwe: Above-ground forest biomass

French Polynesia

148.94 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

Zimbabwe

146.9 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

French Polynesia rank

71st

Zimbabwe rank

74th

Above-ground forest biomass over time

French Polynesia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 148.94 tonnes per hectare against 146.9 tonnes per hectare in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.04 tonnes per hectare.

Across all 10 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 215 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	French Polynesia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	149.48 tonnes per hectare	146.9 tonnes per hectare	2.58 tonnes per hectare	French Polynesia
2000s	148.97 tonnes per hectare	146.9 tonnes per hectare	2.07 tonnes per hectare	French Polynesia
2010s	148.93 tonnes per hectare	113.99 tonnes per hectare	34.94 tonnes per hectare	French Polynesia
2020s	148.94 tonnes per hectare	146.9 tonnes per hectare	2.04 tonnes per hectare	French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground forest biomass, French Polynesia or Zimbabwe?: French Polynesia, at 148.94 tonnes per hectare against 146.9 tonnes per hectare in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between French Polynesia and Zimbabwe?: 2.04 tonnes per hectare, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Zimbabwe?: 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for above-ground forest biomass?: French Polynesia ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Zimbabwe: Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/french-polynesia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/french-polynesia/zimbabwe/">French Polynesia vs Zimbabwe: Above-ground forest biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Above-ground forest biomass
Unit: tonnes per hectare
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 215 places, 1,311 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare).