Iceland vs Saudi Arabia: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Iceland
23.66
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
26.61
in 2020
Iceland rank
191st
Saudi Arabia rank
189th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Iceland
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 26.61 against 23.66 in Iceland, a difference of 2.95.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 191st and Saudi Arabia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.19 | 26.61 | 12.42 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 20.47 | 26.61 | 6.14 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 23.66 | 26.61 | 2.95 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Iceland or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 26.61 against 23.66 in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Iceland and Saudi Arabia?
- 2.95, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Saudi Arabia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Saudi Arabia rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Iceland ranks 191st and Saudi Arabia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.