Jordan vs Sudan: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Jordan
56.9
in 2020
Sudan
55.98
in 2020
Jordan rank
160th
Sudan rank
161st
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Jordan
- Sudan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 56.9 against 55.98 in Sudan, a difference of 0.92.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.9 | 55.98 | 0.92 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 56.9 | 55.98 | 0.92 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 56.9 | 55.98 | 0.92 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Jordan or Sudan?
- Jordan, at 56.9 against 55.98 in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Jordan and Sudan?
- 0.92, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Sudan rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Jordan ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 161st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.