Jordan vs Tunisia: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Jordan
56.9
in 2020
Tunisia
58.74
in 2020
Jordan rank
160th
Tunisia rank
159th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Jordan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 58.74 against 56.9 in Jordan, a difference of 1.84.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 160th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.9 | 53.39 | 3.51 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 56.9 | 58.71 | 1.81 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 56.9 | 58.74 | 1.84 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Jordan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 58.74 against 56.9 in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Jordan and Tunisia?
- 1.84, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Tunisia rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Jordan ranks 160th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.