Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Malawi
78.7
in 2020
Sri Lanka
79.16
in 2020
Malawi rank
138th
Sri Lanka rank
136th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Malawi
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 79.16 against 78.7 in Malawi, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 138th and Sri Lanka ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.7 | 79.23 | 0.53 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 78.7 | 79.19 | 0.4867 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 78.7 | 79.16 | 0.46 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Malawi or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 79.16 against 78.7 in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Malawi and Sri Lanka?
- 0.46, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Sri Lanka rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Malawi ranks 138th and Sri Lanka ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.