New Caledonia vs Rwanda: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
New Caledonia
146
in 2020
Rwanda
146.06
in 2020
New Caledonia rank
67th
Rwanda rank
66th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- New Caledonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 146.06 against 146 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 146 | 143.04 | 2.96 | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 146 | 145.83 | 0.175 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 146 | 146.06 | 0.06 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, New Caledonia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 146.06 against 146 in New Caledonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between New Caledonia and Rwanda?
- 0.06, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Rwanda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do New Caledonia and Rwanda rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- New Caledonia ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.