New Caledonia vs Thailand: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
New Caledonia
146
in 2020
Thailand
142.5
in 2020
New Caledonia rank
67th
Thailand rank
69th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- New Caledonia
- Thailand
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 146 against 142.5 in Thailand, a difference of 3.5.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 67th and Thailand ranks 69th of 201 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 146 | 141.83 | 4.17 | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 146 | 142.51 | 3.49 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 146 | 142.5 | 3.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, New Caledonia or Thailand?
- New Caledonia, at 146 against 142.5 in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between New Caledonia and Thailand?
- 3.5, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Thailand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do New Caledonia and Thailand rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- New Caledonia ranks 67th and Thailand ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.