New Caledonia vs Timor-Leste: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
New Caledonia
146
in 2020
Timor-Leste
150
in 2020
New Caledonia rank
67th
Timor-Leste rank
64th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- New Caledonia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 150 against 146 in New Caledonia, a difference of 4.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 67th and Timor-Leste ranks 64th of 201 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 146 | 150 | 4 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 146 | 150 | 4 | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 146 | 150 | 4 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, New Caledonia or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 150 against 146 in New Caledonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between New Caledonia and Timor-Leste?
- 4, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Timor-Leste?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do New Caledonia and Timor-Leste rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- New Caledonia ranks 67th and Timor-Leste ranks 64th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.