Peru vs Slovenia: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Peru
237.79
in 2020
Slovenia
253.1
in 2020
Peru rank
15th
Slovenia rank
12th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Peru
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 253.1 against 237.79 in Peru, a difference of 15.31.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 15th and Slovenia ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 237.79 | 204.23 | 33.56 | Peru |
| 2010s | 237.79 | 250.6 | 12.81 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 237.79 | 253.1 | 15.31 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Peru or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 253.1 against 237.79 in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Peru and Slovenia?
- 15.31, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Slovenia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Slovenia rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Peru ranks 15th and Slovenia ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.