What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between Rwanda and Slovenia?

9.17 tonnes per hectare, with Slovenia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?

10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Slovenia: Above-ground forest biomass

Rwanda

221.44 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

Slovenia

230.61 tonnes per hectare

in 2025

Rwanda rank

20th

Slovenia rank

17th

Above-ground forest biomass over time

Rwanda
Slovenia

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 230.61 tonnes per hectare against 221.44 tonnes per hectare in Rwanda, a difference of 9.17 tonnes per hectare.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 20th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 215 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	164.56 tonnes per hectare	173.98 tonnes per hectare	9.42 tonnes per hectare	Slovenia
2000s	169.27 tonnes per hectare	204.23 tonnes per hectare	34.96 tonnes per hectare	Slovenia
2010s	157.49 tonnes per hectare	245.95 tonnes per hectare	88.45 tonnes per hectare	Slovenia
2020s	209.66 tonnes per hectare	230.15 tonnes per hectare	20.5 tonnes per hectare	Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground forest biomass, Rwanda or Slovenia?: Slovenia, at 230.61 tonnes per hectare against 221.44 tonnes per hectare in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground forest biomass between Rwanda and Slovenia?: 9.17 tonnes per hectare, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?: 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and Slovenia rank globally for above-ground forest biomass?: Rwanda ranks 20th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Slovenia: Above-ground forest biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/rwanda/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-per-hectare/rwanda/slovenia/">Rwanda vs Slovenia: Above-ground forest biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Above-ground forest biomass
Unit: tonnes per hectare
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 215 places, 1,311 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare).