Rwanda vs East Timor: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Rwanda
146.06
in 2020
East Timor
150
in 2020
Rwanda rank
66th
East Timor rank
64th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Rwanda
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 150 against 146.06 in Rwanda, a difference of 3.94.
Across all 8 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 64th of 201 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 143.04 | 150 | 6.96 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 145.83 | 150 | 4.17 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 146.06 | 150 | 3.94 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Rwanda or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 150 against 146.06 in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Rwanda and East Timor?
- 3.94, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Rwanda ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 64th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.