Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Solomon Islands
95.78
in 2020
Zimbabwe
94.98
in 2020
Solomon Islands rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
117th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Solomon Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 95.78 against 94.98 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.8.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124.73 | 105.06 | 19.67 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 121.47 | 100.01 | 21.47 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 95.78 | 94.98 | 0.8 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Solomon Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Solomon Islands, at 95.78 against 94.98 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Solomon Islands ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.