Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Above ground biomass in forest per hectare
Uganda
96
in 2020
Zimbabwe
94.98
in 2020
Uganda rank
114th
Zimbabwe rank
117th
Above ground biomass in forest per hectare over time
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 96 against 94.98 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Uganda ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96 | 105.06 | 9.06 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 96 | 100.01 | 4.01 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 96 | 94.98 | 1.02 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above ground biomass in forest per hectare, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
- Uganda, at 96 against 94.98 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in above ground biomass in forest per hectare between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 1.02, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for above ground biomass in forest per hectare?
- Uganda ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Above ground biomass in forest per hectare. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.