Australia and New Zealand vs Grenada: Above-ground biomass in forest
Australia and New Zealand
109.39
in 2025
Grenada
109.6
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
120th
Grenada rank
119th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 109.6 against 109.39 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 108.85 | 109.6 | 0.75 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 109.21 | 109.6 | 0.39 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 109.88 | 109.6 | 0.275 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 109.47 | 109.6 | 0.135 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Australia and New Zealand or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 109.6 against 109.39 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Australia and New Zealand and Grenada?
- 0.21, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Grenada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Grenada rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.