Australia and New Zealand vs Hungary: Above-ground biomass in forest
Australia and New Zealand
109.39
in 2025
Hungary
107.89
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
120th
Hungary rank
123rd
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Hungary
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 109.39 against 107.89 in Hungary, a difference of 1.5.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Hungary ranks 123rd of 221 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 108.85 | 88.01 | 20.84 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 109.21 | 92.49 | 16.72 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 109.88 | 96.77 | 13.1 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 109.47 | 106.06 | 3.4 | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Australia and New Zealand or Hungary?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 109.39 against 107.89 in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Australia and New Zealand and Hungary?
- 1.5, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Hungary?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Hungary rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Hungary ranks 123rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.