Australia and New Zealand vs Niue: Above-ground biomass in forest
Australia and New Zealand
109.39
in 2025
Niue
111.82
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
120th
Niue rank
118th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 111.82 against 109.39 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2.43.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Niue ranks 118th of 221 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 108.85 | 111.99 | 3.14 | Niue |
| 2000s | 109.21 | 112.06 | 2.85 | Niue |
| 2010s | 109.88 | 112 | 2.12 | Niue |
| 2020s | 109.47 | 111.82 | 2.35 | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Australia and New Zealand or Niue?
- Niue, at 111.82 against 109.39 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Australia and New Zealand and Niue?
- 2.43, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Niue?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Niue rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and Niue ranks 118th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.