Australia vs Estonia: Above-ground biomass in forest
Australia
99.22
in 2025
Estonia
98.21
in 2025
Australia rank
109th
Estonia rank
110th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Australia
- Estonia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 99.22 against 98.21 in Estonia, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 109th and Estonia ranks 110th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.1 | 92.7 | 7.4 | Australia |
| 2000s | 100.1 | 99.55 | 0.55 | Australia |
| 2010s | 99.81 | 104.64 | 4.83 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 99.22 | 100.44 | 1.22 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Australia or Estonia?
- Australia, at 99.22 against 98.21 in Estonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Australia and Estonia?
- 1.01, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Australia ranks 109th and Estonia ranks 110th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.