Australia vs North Macedonia: Above-ground biomass in forest
Australia
99.22
in 2025
North Macedonia
100.35
in 2025
Australia rank
109th
North Macedonia rank
108th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Australia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 100.35 against 99.22 in Australia, a difference of 1.13.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Australia ranks 109th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.1 | 107.45 | 7.35 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 100.1 | 105.78 | 5.68 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 99.81 | 99.58 | 0.235 | Australia |
| 2020s | 99.22 | 99.57 | 0.35 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Australia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 100.35 against 99.22 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Australia and North Macedonia?
- 1.13, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and North Macedonia rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Australia ranks 109th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.