Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Above-ground biomass in forest
Bosnia and Herzegovina
171.93
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
175
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
58th
Papua New Guinea rank
55th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 175 against 171.93 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3.07.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 58th and Papua New Guinea ranks 55th of 221 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119.82 | 175 | 55.18 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 154.28 | 175 | 20.72 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 168.41 | 175 | 6.59 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 170.48 | 175 | 4.52 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 175 against 171.93 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 3.07, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 58th and Papua New Guinea ranks 55th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.