Chile vs Rwanda: Above-ground biomass in forest
Chile
219.27 t per ha
in 2025
Rwanda
221.44 t per ha
in 2025
Chile rank
20th
Rwanda rank
18th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 221.44 t per ha against 219.27 t per ha in Chile, a difference of 2.17 t per ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 184 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 224.88 t per ha | 164.56 t per ha | 60.32 t per ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 221.86 t per ha | 169.27 t per ha | 52.59 t per ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 219.58 t per ha | 180.61 t per ha | 38.97 t per ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 219.27 t per ha | 209.66 t per ha | 9.62 t per ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Chile or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 221.44 t per ha against 219.27 t per ha in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Chile and Rwanda?
- 2.17 t per ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Chile ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.