Comoros vs South Africa: Above-ground biomass in forest
Comoros
65.93
in 2025
South Africa
67.72
in 2025
Comoros rank
147th
South Africa rank
144th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Comoros
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 67.72 against 65.93 in Comoros, a difference of 1.79.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Africa ahead.
Comoros ranks 147th and South Africa ranks 144th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.95 | 66.95 | 1 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 65.92 | 67.19 | 1.27 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 65.96 | 67.47 | 1.51 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 65.97 | 64.61 | 1.36 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Comoros or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 67.72 against 65.93 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Comoros and South Africa?
- 1.79, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and South Africa rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Comoros ranks 147th and South Africa ranks 144th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.