Curacao vs Zimbabwe: Above-ground biomass in forest
Curacao
142.86 t per ha
in 2025
Zimbabwe
146.9 t per ha
in 2025
Curacao rank
81st
Zimbabwe rank
78th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Curacao
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 146.9 t per ha against 142.86 t per ha in Curacao, a difference of 4.04 t per ha.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 81st and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 222 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 142.86 t per ha | 146.9 t per ha | 4.04 t per ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 142.86 t per ha | 146.9 t per ha | 4.04 t per ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 142.86 t per ha | 146.9 t per ha | 4.04 t per ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 142.86 t per ha | 146.9 t per ha | 4.04 t per ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Curacao or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 146.9 t per ha against 142.86 t per ha in Curacao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Curacao and Zimbabwe?
- 4.04 t per ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and Zimbabwe rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Curacao ranks 81st and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.