Finland vs Western Sahara: Above-ground biomass in forest
Finland
61.09
in 2025
Western Sahara
62.19
in 2025
Finland rank
156th
Western Sahara rank
153rd
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Finland
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 62.19 against 61.09 in Finland, a difference of 1.1.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 156th and Western Sahara ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.86 | 53.65 | 9.79 | Western Sahara |
| 2000s | 49.14 | 59.59 | 10.45 | Western Sahara |
| 2010s | 56.7 | 62.61 | 5.91 | Western Sahara |
| 2020s | 61.09 | 63.2 | 2.1 | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Finland or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 62.19 against 61.09 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Finland and Western Sahara?
- 1.1, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Western Sahara?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Western Sahara rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Finland ranks 156th and Western Sahara ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.