Iceland vs Iraq: Above-ground biomass in forest
Iceland
27.98
in 2025
Iraq
31.58
in 2025
Iceland rank
183rd
Iraq rank
180th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Iceland
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 31.58 against 27.98 in Iceland, a difference of 3.6.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 183rd and Iraq ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.62 | 57.08 | 41.46 | Iraq |
| 2000s | 11.79 | 57.09 | 45.3 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 16.46 | 58.98 | 42.52 | Iraq |
| 2020s | 25.99 | 30.4 | 4.41 | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Iceland or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 31.58 against 27.98 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Iceland and Iraq?
- 3.6, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Iraq?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Iraq rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Iceland ranks 183rd and Iraq ranks 180th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.