Iceland vs Sudan: Above-ground biomass in forest
Iceland
27.98
in 2025
Sudan
17.49
in 2025
Iceland rank
183rd
Sudan rank
186th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Iceland
- Sudan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 27.98 against 17.49 in Sudan, a difference of 10.49.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.6 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 183rd and Sudan ranks 186th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.62 | 13.69 | 1.93 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 11.79 | 14.59 | 2.8 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 16.46 | 15.91 | 0.545 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 25.99 | 19.21 | 6.78 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Iceland or Sudan?
- Iceland, at 27.98 against 17.49 in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Iceland and Sudan?
- 10.49, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Sudan rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Iceland ranks 183rd and Sudan ranks 186th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.