Kenya vs North Macedonia: Above-ground biomass in forest
Kenya
106.66
in 2025
North Macedonia
100.35
in 2025
Kenya rank
105th
North Macedonia rank
108th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Kenya
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 106.66 against 100.35 in North Macedonia, a difference of 6.31.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 108.33 | 107.45 | 0.88 | Kenya |
| 2000s | 94.59 | 105.78 | 11.19 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 104.29 | 99.58 | 4.72 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 106.66 | 99.57 | 7.09 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Kenya or North Macedonia?
- Kenya, at 106.66 against 100.35 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Kenya and North Macedonia?
- 6.31, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and North Macedonia rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Kenya ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.