Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Above-ground biomass in forest

Micronesia (Federated States of)
197.61
in 2025
Northern Africa and Western Asia
45.83
in 2025
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
36th
Northern Africa and Western Asia rank
33rd

Above-ground biomass in forest over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Northern Africa and Western Asia
50100150200199020072025

How they compare

Micronesia (Federated States of) currently reports 197.61 against 45.83 in Northern Africa and Western Asia, a difference of 151.78.

That makes Micronesia (Federated States of)'s figure about 4.3 times Northern Africa and Western Asia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Micronesia (Federated States of) has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 36th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 33rd of 221 countries.

Micronesia (Federated States of) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) Northern Africa and Western Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 197.7 35.67 162.03 Micronesia (Federated States of)
2000s 197.62 38.53 159.09 Micronesia (Federated States of)
2010s 197.58 43.09 154.5 Micronesia (Federated States of)
2020s 197.61 46.27 151.35 Micronesia (Federated States of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Northern Africa and Western Asia?
Micronesia (Federated States of), at 197.61 against 45.83 in Northern Africa and Western Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
151.78, with Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Northern Africa and Western Asia rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 36th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 33rd of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Above-ground biomass in forest. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/micronesia-federated-states-of/northern-africa-and-western-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/micronesia-federated-states-of/northern-africa-and-western-asia/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Above-ground biomass in forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 1,535 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed