New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Above-ground biomass in forest
New Caledonia
146
in 2025
Zimbabwe
146.9
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
68th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- New Caledonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 146.9 against 146 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.9.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 145.99 | 146.9 | 0.91 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 146 | 146.9 | 0.9 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 146 | 146.9 | 0.9 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 146 | 146.9 | 0.9 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 146.9 against 146 in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.9, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- New Caledonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.