Northern Africa and Western Asia vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Above-ground biomass in forest

Northern Africa and Western Asia
45.83
in 2025
Wallis and Futuna Islands
198.71
in 2025
Northern Africa and Western Asia rank
33rd
Wallis and Futuna Islands rank
35th

Above-ground biomass in forest over time

  • Northern Africa and Western Asia
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
50100150200199020072025

How they compare

Wallis and Futuna Islands currently reports 198.71 against 45.83 in Northern Africa and Western Asia, a difference of 152.88.

That makes Wallis and Futuna Islands's figure about 4.3 times Northern Africa and Western Asia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Wallis and Futuna Islands has been ahead every year.

Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 33rd and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 35th of 35 groups.

Wallis and Futuna Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Africa and Western Asia Wallis and Futuna Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 35.67 199.38 163.71 Wallis and Futuna Islands
2000s 38.53 198.03 159.5 Wallis and Futuna Islands
2010s 43.09 198.45 155.36 Wallis and Futuna Islands
2020s 46.27 198.68 152.42 Wallis and Futuna Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Northern Africa and Western Asia or Wallis and Futuna Islands?
Wallis and Futuna Islands, at 198.71 against 45.83 in Northern Africa and Western Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Northern Africa and Western Asia and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
152.88, with Wallis and Futuna Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Western Asia and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Northern Africa and Western Asia and Wallis and Futuna Islands rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 33rd and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 35th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Africa and Western Asia vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Above-ground biomass in forest. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/northern-africa-and-western-asia/wallis-and-futuna-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/northern-africa-and-western-asia/wallis-and-futuna-islands/">Northern Africa and Western Asia vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Above-ground biomass in forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 1,535 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed