Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Suriname: Above-ground biomass in forest

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
179.99
in 2025
Suriname
302.6
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
4th
Suriname rank
7th

Above-ground biomass in forest over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Suriname
0100200300199020072025

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 302.6 against 179.99 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 122.61.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 7th of 35 groups.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 179.81 302.6 122.79 Suriname
2000s 179.89 302.6 122.71 Suriname
2010s 179.95 302.6 122.65 Suriname
2020s 179.98 302.6 122.62 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Suriname?
Suriname, at 302.6 against 179.99 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Suriname?
122.61, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Suriname?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Suriname rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 7th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Suriname: Above-ground biomass in forest. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/above-ground-biomass-in-forest-tonnes-per-hectare/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/suriname/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Suriname: Above-ground biomass in forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
256 places, 1,535 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed