Rwanda vs Slovenia: Above-ground biomass in forest
Rwanda
221.44
in 2025
Slovenia
230.61
in 2025
Rwanda rank
19th
Slovenia rank
17th
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Rwanda
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 230.61 against 221.44 in Rwanda, a difference of 9.17.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 19th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 164.56 | 173.98 | 9.42 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 169.27 | 204.23 | 34.96 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 180.61 | 234.93 | 54.32 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 209.66 | 230.15 | 20.5 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Rwanda or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 230.61 against 221.44 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Rwanda and Slovenia?
- 9.17, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Slovenia rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Rwanda ranks 19th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.