Sri Lanka vs Western Sahara: Above-ground biomass in forest
Sri Lanka
62.52
in 2025
Western Sahara
62.19
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
152nd
Western Sahara rank
153rd
Above-ground biomass in forest over time
- Sri Lanka
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 62.52 against 62.19 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 152nd and Western Sahara ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Western Sahara in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62.55 | 53.65 | 8.9 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 62.45 | 59.59 | 2.86 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 62.28 | 62.61 | 0.335 | Western Sahara |
| 2020s | 62.51 | 63.2 | 0.685 | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher above-ground biomass in forest, Sri Lanka or Western Sahara?
- Sri Lanka, at 62.52 against 62.19 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in above-ground biomass in forest between Sri Lanka and Western Sahara?
- 0.33, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Western Sahara?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Western Sahara rank globally for above-ground biomass in forest?
- Sri Lanka ranks 152nd and Western Sahara ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.