Armenia vs Montenegro: Drinking water service usage

Armenia
82.1%
in 2024
Montenegro
85.5%
in 2024
Armenia rank
83rd
Montenegro rank
81st

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Armenia
  • Montenegro
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 85.5% against 82.1% in Armenia, a difference of 3.4%.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 83rd and Montenegro ranks 81st of 163 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 83.2% 84.1% 0.9% Montenegro
2010s 82.8% 84.9% 2.1% Montenegro
2020s 82.2% 85.5% 3.3% Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Armenia or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 85.5% against 82.1% in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Armenia and Montenegro?
3.4%, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Montenegro?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Montenegro rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Armenia ranks 83rd and Montenegro ranks 81st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.